Date: 2007-01-26 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spamsink.livejournal.com
A reasonable precaution to avoid accessory charges to a Ponzi scheme in case the virtual property market collapses.

Date: 2007-01-28 02:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arpad.livejournal.com
Rather more direct collision with TOS of the most MMO providing companies.

Virtual property market collapse can happen at the moment only in the Second Life project where speculations are possible. But the bulk of the virtual property market is based on MMO formula where time is traded for advancement. And while it goes up and down it is quite immune to any speculative schemes.

Date: 2007-01-28 03:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spamsink.livejournal.com
Rather more direct collision with TOS of the most MMO providing companies.

That could be as well, but eBay is not in the business of enforcing them and has no obligations toward those companies; why would they bother prohibiting sales of virtual properties if that was the only problem? OTOH, selling "game play training services" would be much harder to suppress.

Profile

arpad: (Default)
arpad

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 1st, 2026 01:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios