arpad: (Default)
[personal profile] arpad
.
I wasted a lot of time thinking about some wise solution for online synchronization between my mailboxes and bookmarks at home, work and multiple remote locations.

Finally I got tired of it - and, urged by [livejournal.com profile] gholam, just bought this:



Put on it portable Firefox. Put on it portable Thunderbird. Imported 1,5 GB of my mail archives. Consolidated bookmarks files. Cleared some crap out of them all in process.

And it works. The best of it - I don't need to care about sync. anymore. Because there are no sync needed. And backups become very easy - just copy paste content of disk on key to hard disk and bingo.

Note: if you do the same - choose quickest possible flash drive. When I edit bookmarks the small delay is here.

Date: 2007-04-24 10:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iz-kustov-ved.livejournal.com
You are lucky - the system on all your comps is the same. It's not a good way 4 sync Mac@home and PC@work...

Date: 2007-04-24 10:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arpad.livejournal.com
Yea, when you have PC+MAC - you need smart solution :( Moving to gmail in that case is advisable.

Date: 2007-04-24 11:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iz-kustov-ved.livejournal.com
I already moved my work with texts to google (I need no tricky formatting). Maybe gmail is really a good choice.

Date: 2007-04-25 02:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gholam.livejournal.com
A radical solution would be installing Windows on the mac ;)

Date: 2007-04-25 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Parallels Desktop is your friend.

Zero performance penalty on latest Macs and greatest flexibility. You can keep VM instances on per customer basis.

borisk

Date: 2007-04-25 06:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iz-kustov-ved.livejournal.com
I needn't windows at home. If the only problem is to sync it's too much mess 4 me to organise VMs ;) I'll better try Google solution.

Date: 2007-04-25 04:34 am (UTC)
vitus_wagner: My photo 2005 (Default)
From: [personal profile] vitus_wagner
What strange things users would do only not to use normal OS.

Date: 2007-04-25 04:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arpad.livejournal.com
Huh? You mean MAC?

Date: 2007-04-25 04:43 am (UTC)
vitus_wagner: My photo 2005 (Default)
From: [personal profile] vitus_wagner
No, I mean OS, which is not arrogant enough to consider itself friend of user (user-friendly) and behaves as slave of user, as it should.

Date: 2007-04-25 05:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arpad.livejournal.com
I don't get it, sorry. I think I understand what you are saying but I don't see how using any different OS could have helped here. OS and data synchronization are completely different areas.

Date: 2007-04-25 05:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gholam.livejournal.com
An OS that behaves as a slave of user, as opposed to a huge brute of a taskmaster with a big club and a fake smile, will be wrecked by said user into a completely unusable state within minutes of installation - if not during the installation itself.

Date: 2007-04-25 07:51 am (UTC)

Date: 2007-04-26 06:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wildernesscat.livejournal.com
How big is yours?

Date: 2007-04-26 07:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arpad.livejournal.com
quite small - 2GB. Would have taken 4gb gt today.

Profile

arpad: (Default)
arpad

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 05:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios