Rant++

[arpad]

Burg got his minute of fame in New Yorker. Funny, but his story makes me not gloomy, but optimistic. In a way.

Israelis are stretched between family, army and multitude of jobs. Rift between orthodox and secular society, rifts between Jewish communities, Arab minority, outside enemies, tax burden, crisis of elite, corruption, et cetera. Makes one feel awful.

But when I read all that fuss about Burg - I understand that outside world don't know a thing about real Israel. Holocaust-obsessed, militaristic and xenophobic - that's the line that Burg is selling there.

Those who listen to him can't grasp that majority of people voting for Israel left had served in the army. They don't know that the best antidote from militarism is to have real enemies - you understand first-hand that army can only protect you to some degree, not solve any problems for you. They never saw Israel youth that can be called anything, but xenophobic. And difference between remembering Holocaust and being obsessed by it is something you can't explain to them.

And I see that our problems - are problems of real life.


1963 Ben-Gurion vs. Nasser

We did impossible task of rising a country from the ashes of thousand years long exile. We did it on barren land devoid of oil, surrounded by enemies, in spite of worst massacre in our history. And we didn't turned into fanatics. We didn't succumbed to socialist ideas. We didn't become a backward country struggling for survival.

We are here. Changing, growing, developing.

And of course we have a hell lot of problems. But it is an only way to have a future.

Comments

[marimhe.livejournal.com]

oh, ok, would you say that USA is a militaristic country? I would, and so would, let's see... 90% of the world. And yet, USA military spendings represent 4.06% of the GBD (2005 est.) .
Yours is...?
Actually, your country ranks 6th in terms of military spendings. And the first one is Oman. Well, not really a threat, is it? (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2034rank.html)
USA are in the ... 27th place.

[arpad.livejournal.com]

4% from how many trillion dollar? :)

And why do you think quite peaceful Oman and Katar spend so much? I don't suppose you believe that they are worried about Israel sneak attack?

We don't have peace agreement with Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon and many others. We have a very cold peace with Egypt and warmer with Jordan.

Yes - 3 years of compulsory military service and that level of spendings is not something a country can enjoy. But it is a necessary evil, caused by our environment, not by our eternal love to rifles, planes and tanks.

[marimhe.livejournal.com]

Well, the main constituent of any discussion is objectivity, and I don't think we are quite there.
The choice to rate one country's military spendings in terms of GDB percentage was not accidental, so I don't think that figures really matter.

Anyway, for the past 30 or 40 years your country leaded a very strong occupation policy, that's a fact. In this perspective I don't see how you can obtain a peace agreement with countries which territories you either occupied or attacked on a regular basis. And I don't see how you can manage to put a blame on them. Then again, "the necessary evil" and your "hostile environment" sound like a very good excuse. But somehow, I can't ignore this famous extract from Josef Weitz's (JNF director) diary:
"It must be clear that there is no room in the country for both peoples...If the Arabs leave it, the country will become wide and spacious for us...The only solution is a land of Israel...without Arabs. There is no room here for compromises...There is no way but to transfer the Arabs from here to the neighbouring countries, save perhaps for [the Arabs of] Bethlehem, Nazareth and old Jerusalem. Not one village must be left, not one [bedouin] tribe. The transfer must be directed at Iraq, Syria and even Transjordan. For this goal funds will be found...and only after this transfer will the country be able to absorb millions of our brothers and the Jewish problem will cease to exist. There is no other solution." (http://www.scottishpsc.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1706&Itemid=105)
He wrote it in 1940.

[arpad.livejournal.com]

I won't discuss endless issues of our rights to this land. But when talking about "occupation" one should remember that Palestine of Mandate times is Jewish land at least at same degree as it is an Arab land.

From international law viewpoint we have UN partition decision of 1947 that was accepted by Israel and rejected by all its neighbors. Since 1948 we have no "rights" here. We have a war. In 1967 Israel had no peace with any of its neighbors, but cease fire agreements. And Palestine was just as "occupied" by Jordan and Egypt.

Do you really tell me that in 1948 we should have become slaves again? Just to avoid these ungainly military adventures and bad opinion of outside world? I believe not.

Wars can and should end in peace with your former enemy. But the only way to achieve this peace is being both - strong and open to dialog when it possible. We made peace with Egypt and Jordan. And we will make it with our other neighbors when they come to their senses.

From history viewpoint I can mention India and Pakistan being in war since the end of colonial rule. But somehow neither country got an "occupation power" label, though India still "occupies" Kashmir in the eyes of Pakistan. Now they even reached something like cold peace.

So we just accept their past and hope that they will resolve their differences. One should try to think about Israel and its neighbors in same way.

Cause calling one side in conflict "occupying power" is a total BS, pardon my French...